It seems as if life would change dramatically after something as eventful as arbitration, but it hasn't. The birds still sing in the morning; I still sweat in the heat, and the grass still needs to be cut Monday. I'm waiting. Both sides have to write briefs. Then, they both exchange briefs and give them to the arbitrator. Finally, he renders a decision. The deadline for everyone to finish briefs is July 30th. I like Holly's comment, "Good grief!"
A few events of the day, April 16th, I deem meaningful:
The star witness we canceled the last arbitration date for could not be there, so a substitute sat in for her. I wish the "not so star witness" well, but that did not surprise me, somehow. I'm seeing a cookie walking down the street.
Michelle Vanderlay, from the union, sat in on the proceedings. The union withdrew their grievance toward the district at the last minute. Both lawyers were planning to proceed,anyway. I would love to see that union agenda. In the words of a little girl I overheard looking at a big cookie walking down the sidewalk on highway 50 many years ago, I can only say, "What is
THAT all about?"
The superintendent was gracious and kind to me and said he had "an open door policy." He proceeded to focus mostly on elementary test scores that had nothing to do with my case. Whew! I'm having a cookie incident flashback.
My immediate boss, Scott Fritz, said he had to get me out of the building (hence, banishing me to the rubber room) because I made the team uncomfortable by saying things such as "they were Nazi's." He indicated that my team members went to him and told him these things. I thought my team liked me. Sigh. I see a big cookie. I hear a questioning voice.
I knew Helsby, the district's attorney, was going to try to paint me as a subversive "under miner". I had practice with my meetings with Stewart Singer. I was not surprised by any of his questions. The little girl's image is fading, but I can still see that fat cookie walking down Highway 50. What
WAS that all about?
I finally told my story to an objective party. He is older and was getting worn by the late afternoon, but something about him seemed square. I appreciate that in an arbitrator.
Final thought on questions: A good question is worth its weight in gold.
Here's what happened.
Since I used "Academic Freedom" from my contract as a basis for much of my grievance, Helsby asked me if I believed it was absolute. I said, "No." He asked, "If someone were undermining the District Superintendent's goals, do you think 'Academic freedom' covers them?" I replied, "If someone were deliberately undermining the Superintendent's goals, I do not think 'Academic Freedom' would cover that." Helsby then ended his questioning, and my wise lawyer asked me three final questions I appreciate. He understands me.
1. Q."Do you believe asking questions is undermining an initiative?"
A. "No."
Q. "Do you think talking about problems and looking at the issues arising is undermining an initiative?"
A. "No."
Q. "Do you think seeing issues and troubles arise in an initiative and keeping your mouth shut because of fear or other reasons is undermining an initiative?"
A."Yes."
I rest my case.
This verse comes to mind, "All things work together for good for those who love God according to his purpose." Another thought, please pray for the absent "star witness". She's battling breast cancer. I wish her peace and healing.
Peace. Love, Linda